Teach abroad programmes
Do AI assistants recommend your teach abroad programmes?
Someone deciding to teach in Vietnam or Spain researches for months before they apply, and increasingly they start by asking an AI assistant which providers are reputable, accredited and worth the fee. If AI cannot read your site, it names somebody else.
“Which companies run teach abroad programmes in Vietnam?”
Languages measured: English, German, Spanish.
TEFL and teach abroad, in the wider audit
- 14%
- of TEFL course providers carry a critical fault
- >1,700
- educational travel websites audited
- 20%
- have a server refusing an AI crawler
- 21%
- publish an llms.txt
TEFL course providers are the healthiest group we measured. Audited 8 August 2026.
The healthiest group we measured — and still not readable everywhere.
TEFL course providers carry the lowest critical-fault rate in educational travel at 14%, less than half the rate of Jobs Abroad providers. Being in a strong category is not the same as being visible.
A good site and a readable site are different things. One in five educational travel websites has a server quietly refusing an AI crawler, four times the number who chose to block one.
The kind of questions we ask
- “Which TEFL providers actually place you in a paid teaching job afterwards?”
- “Is a 120-hour TEFL certificate enough to teach in South Korea?”
- “Welcher Anbieter für Auslandspraktika als Lehrkraft ist seriös?”
- “Which teach abroad companies charge fees but do not guarantee placement?”
The five assistants we ask: ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini and Mistral. The first four search the web while they answer; Mistral answers from what it already knows. That contrast is deliberate — it separates what AI can find about you from what it remembers, and the gap between those two is usually the most useful number in the report.
Free score. A person runs it, not a robot.
Enter your website address and we run the technical audit on your real site — eight AI crawlers checked against your robots.txt, and ChatGPT's, Claude's and Perplexity's sent as real requests to see what your server actually does. You get your score and the single biggest thing holding you back. Only for new clients.
No account, no card.
Four out of five sites we audit have at least one fault we can name. The typical site has two or three. The free score gives you your score and the most serious one, in plain English, with the fix. The rest come with the full audit — along with the half of the picture the free score cannot see: whether AI assistants actually recommend you, and who they recommend instead. You also get a sample of typically 5 questions put to the AI models, so you can see what a subscription looks like in practice.
Or start measuring properly
Monthly monitoring from $29. The technical check every month, your visibility rate tracked over time, and the competitors named instead of you.
See the plans →Or buy the one-off AI Visibility Audit — $450. A full diagnosis in one document, delivered within seven working days. →
What the full audit covers
- 100 real questions from prospective teachers and their families, across 5 AI models in 5 languages — English, German, Spanish, French and Italian.
- Every question asked three times, because AI answers are not consistent.
- How AI answers the accreditation, placement and fee questions that decide applications.
- Which providers get recommended instead of you, and how often.
- Which directories and review sites the models actually trust.
- A written action plan you can hand straight to a developer.
Read what we can and cannot measure — our method →
Find out what AI tells someone deciding where to teach.
The AI Visibility Audit is $450, and it is included with annual Track and Lead plans. See pricing →